Here’s the thing about Taka Torimoto: He’s more likely to remember his smartphone than his billfold. And that spells opportunity for a whole raft of new players in the lucrative payments industry.
A 41-year-old technical consultant with an engineering degree from Georgia Institute of Technology, Torimoto has paid for fast food with the tap of his phone and sent money just as you would attachments in emails. His father digitally sends the grandkids cash for Christmas. No more checks.
Torimoto’s voice rises with excitement as he talks about the new possibilities. “Payments is one area that is going in so many different directions.”
For the first time since the advent of credit cards, there are new ways to pay that don’t involve cash, check or plastic. Most are built on top of the existing payments system, but — courtesy of that hand-held computer in our pockets and purses — offer new vistas for both consumers and tech entrepreneurs.
“It’s clear that the mobile phone is the device that people are going to be using in the future to pay,” said David S. Evans, chairman of the Global Economics Group. “It’s not going to be a plastic card.”
By 2017, Forrester Research estimates, Americans will spend roughly $90 billion using a smartphone or other handheld device, a more than seven-fold increase from the amount spent in 2012. The firm’s figures include mobile remote commerce; mobile peer to peer payments and remittances; and mobile proximity payments.
Even if its estimate is too optimistic — as projections in this arena have tended to be — the pace at which startups are emerging is already head-spinning: Stripe, PayNearMe and WePay, among more than a thousand others, fueled by billions of dollars in venture capital.
For consumers, mobile payments mean greater convenience and better security. For merchants and banks, they present new opportunities to track you and target sales pitches and rewards to you. And they give tech entrepreneurs a low-cost entry point into the multi-billion dollar payments pipeline.
So why aren’t already living in a post-plastic world?
In part, because everyone involved in the chain — merchants, card issuers, traditional processors, tech innovators and consumers — is looking to maximize how much money they keep at the end of the day. Sometimes, the interests of two or more players align, but often they don’t.
Sorting it out — via market forces and regulation — is likely to make for a period that’s exciting, bewildering, messy and frustrating. And right now, we’re at an inflection point, where what emerged as a handful of novelties is becoming a new way of doing business.
That’s evident in the changes the incumbents are making. Banks, payment networks such as Visa, MasterCard, Discover and Amex, and the tech companies that serve them, such as FIS and Fiserv, are scrambling to keep up.
“In 2014, you’ll see larger payments entities scramble to accelerate the pace of their innovation to catch up to these smaller and more nimble competitors,” PayPal President David Marcus predicted in a blog post.
“Meanwhile, smaller players will scramble to achieve the scale and experience needed to compete in a global business,” he wrote. “As a result, billions of dollars will be at play in the payment industry, and 2014 will be a year of game-changing disruption.”
Last year, PayPal launched 58 new products, partly because of new threats, according to a recent New York Times report.
And earlier this year the e-commerce arm of eBay announced PayPal Beacon, a Bluetooth device that reads payment information from a smartphone. With that device, someone like a restaurant server would no longer have to take your card away from the table to complete a transaction.
That’s in addition to a partnership with Discover, which lets folks use PayPal in the checkout line at some of the nation’s largest merchants. PayPal has also recently acquired progressive payment processor Braintree, which has regulatory approval to move money nationwide.
It’s marketing its services to mobile-based innovators such as Uber, Airbnb and TaskRabbit, which facilitate transactions between individual sellers and buyers of, respectively, rides, lodging and doers of household errands and other tasks.
And we haven’t even talked yet about bitcoin and other cryptocurrencies, which operate in a parallel payments universe, completely outside the existing system.
To be sure, some of the innovations won’t stick.
“Innovation and disruption is an inherently inefficient and lofty process,” said Matt Harris, managing director at Bain Capital Ventures. He harkens back to the first wave of dot-coms, with its rash of failures.
“We are at that now, at least in consumer financial services,” he said.
But some of the experiments will succeed, and at least a few will change the landscape for all of us.
The practice of paying others is at the psychological core of who we are. It lets us buy, sell and, most importantly, earn through our labor. It allows us to say thank you in a tangible way.
Effectively, anything can be a form of payment as long as it is widely distributed, safe, accepted by both buyer and seller, and regulated by a system of rules. Over time, forms of payment have included cattle, wampum, notes issued by individual banks (which were IOUs for gold and silver held in their vaults), and currency backed by the “full faith and credit” of the United States.
The current system, in which we carry plastic cards that identify us and vouchsafe our ability to pay the debts we incur to the people who accept them as payment, evolved in the 1950s and ’60s.
To understand who all is in the chain, first you have to get hold of the process. Here’s how it works:
You swipe your card, say, at your favorite deli counter. Several different things happen almost simultaneously.
First, a card reader, the black box in front of the cashier, scans the magnetic stripe on the back of your card. That information is transmitted through an acquiring processor, such as First Data or Total System Services Inc. (TSYS), which sends your personal details to the payment network whose logo is on the card — say, Visa or MasterCard.
That company forwards the information to the issuer, such as your bank, which makes sure you have enough money. If you do, the issuer sends an authorization code back down the food chain to the merchant in milliseconds.
The money doesn’t move quite as fast; it’s transmitted to the merchant in a settlement process that happens overnight.
For performing its role in the dance, each intermediary receives a small cut.
Last year, issuers, which tend to receive the largest cut, earned an estimated $230 billion in transaction-specific revenues globally, according to a report from the Boston Consulting Group.
As a part of that, merchants pay anywhere from 2 percent to 3 percent of the sales price to accept a credit card, and 21 cents plus 0.05 percent of the transaction value to accept debit cards, a rate that’s gone down because of action by Congress.
Innovators want to step inside that system. In return for adding something of value, such as a more seamless experience, they want to receive something of value, either an added fee or information about your buying habits that they can parlay into money.
Take Atlanta-based Sionic Mobile, which asks merchants to pay a 1 percent transaction fee when customers pay with ION Rewards. Today, shoppers can earn and spend those loyalty rewards at roughly 25,000 stores nationwide. The rewards program gives them an incentive to do more of their shopping at those stores.
Some merchants (think: Starbucks) have jumped directly into the fray, developing apps that generate codes you can scan at the point of sale to complete a purchase.
Torimoto is in that mix, an avatar of what’s to come. He’s a former employee of Alpharetta, Ga.-based CorFire, which helped Google create its first iteration of Wallet and Dunkin Donuts build payments into its mobile app.
As for his own usage of Wallet, arguably the farthest mobile payments have crept in the real world, he’s barely touched it — except of course for that one time in a McDonald’s a year or so ago just to see if it worked.
Most merchants don’t yet have the technology to let him tap his phone rather than swipe a card; others, even some of the big-boxes, are reportedly turning the capability off.
And the points you get on your credit card don’t necessarily get passed through in the same way. Yet.
This year, in Torimoto’s view, won’t be one of breakthroughs. But he does expect spurts of innovation cropping up across the payments horizon.
“Everything, I feel like everything, right now, is almost like a hack job,” he said.
But each successful hack accelerates the pace of change. It’s just a matter of time.
Google has given refunds to people who downloaded Virus Shield, a top selling Android app that didn't work, according to Michael Crider of Android Police.
Users are getting a full refund as well as an extra $5 credit to the Google Play Store for Android apps.
Around 10,000 people downloaded the $3.99 app before Google finally took it down.
Virus Shield promised it could protect your Android phone from harmful spyware, but never actually scanned your phone for malware. Instead, it just showed a green check mark saying the scan was finished.
Google's refund is coming two weeks after the app was pulled from the store.
Users have a 15 minute window  to get all of their money back after they download something from Google Play. Once that window is closed, customers are stuck with the app.
The Google Play Store has been plagued with harmful apps lately. Last week, a security firm discovered that Google let in a malicious app  which could manipulate app icons and take people to phishing sites.
Here's the email Android owners who downloaded Virus Shield received from Google:
"Hello,
We're reaching out to you because you recently purchased the “Virus Shield” app on Google Play.
This app made the false claim that it provided one-click virus protection; in reality, it did not.
Google Play's policies strictly prohibit false claims like these, and in light of this, we're refunding you for your "Virus Shield" purchase. You should see funds returned to your account within the next 14 days.
Additionally we'd like to offer you $5 promotional credit1, which can be used to purchase digital content on Google Play such as apps, games, books, music and movies.
Your credit redemption code is XXXXXXXXXXXXXXX. Click or tap here to redeem. For help redeeming, please visit our Help Center.
We're sorry for any inconvenience this may have caused; rest assured that we're always working to make Google Play better for our users.
Thank you,
Google Play Support"

If you missed your chance to buy Google Glass Tuesday, it's probably for the best, according to the product's earliest users.
Google opened the gates to its face-mounted computer for a 24-hour window last week, and an eager public snapped up every model. Hate it or love it, everyone is curious.
But the Google Glass "Explorers"—a select group who got the first few thousand models—have a message for people who want to join their tech-savvy in-crowd: Wait.
"There's no rush," said Explorer and developer of the GlassFit app Noble Ackerson, "[Future iterations are] probably going to be cheaper and a lot better than this beta product."
It's not that Glass isn't innovative or promising—it just delivers limited utility for its $1,500 price tag. "It continues to frustrate me because it's so unfinished," said technology blogger Robert Scoble. "It's a very expensive price for what it does right now."
Users complained that the dearth of applications—both from Google and third-party developers—means Glass just isn't all that useful yet. Some were frustrated about the recent decision to scrap the video-calling feature. A Google developer conference in June will showcase new software—and provide a test of Glass's mass market viability, Scoble said.
For now, the general consensus among the Explorers National Journal talked with is that Glass just isn't practical for the average use.
"When people are looking at buying Glass, they need to understand it's a concept," said Larry Domine, who teaches at Milwaukee Area Technical College. "It's really at the development stage." Added Larry Walsh, who runs the IT news and analysis site Channelnomics: "It's just not a very intuitive or usable device."
Ackerson, who just celebrated his one-year anniversary as an Explorer, believes Glass's acceptance will depend on its utility. "The general population won't get used to Glass until they find a use for it," he said.
And the slow rollout of Glass, says Ackerson, fuels an "aura of exclusivity" and "echo chamber" of criticism from people who haven't even worn the device. To help satiate the curiosity of the many who don't have a pair of Glass, he started the Society of Glass Enthusiasts, which now has over 3,000 members, to help educate the general public about the product.
On the other hand, Daniel Castro, a senior analyst at the Information Technology and Innovation Institute in Washington, believes that Google's gradual rollout is a smart move because it allows for a trial-and-error period with a small group of people enthusiastic about Glass's success.
Among the most common laments is Glass's battery life, which Google says is improved in its latest update. Users also said they hoped to see better apps for navigation, environment recognition, and communication. "A lot of things that I want to do are still apps that I have on my phone," Domine said.
"Google's been getting a pretty steady barrage of criticisms over Glass," Walsh said. "It's not about privacy; it's about functionality."
Even shooting hands-free photos and videos—one of Glass's main calling cards—has come with problems. Users reported accidentally taking photos by blinking, some of which ended up on Facebook. Scoble added that the tiny screen makes it difficult to review photos, and there's no way to upload them to services like Instagram.
So who should be using Glass? Explorers said the clientele falls into three categories: Developers or creatives with a business idea, technophiles (who probably already have a pair), and people with extra money to spend.
"It was the first-kid-on-the-block thing that got me," said Walsh. "My experience with it proved it not to be a good investment."
One Explorer who has put the technology to professional use is Dr. Rafael Grossman, who has performed surgery while wearing Glass and sees lots of possibility in the healthcare field. He was able to livestream an operation while his students watched. "If you could integrate Glass to the electronic health record, … I think that you prevent medical errors."
Still, Grossman said he uses his Glass only for professional purposes. "At that price tag, the regular user would not be making a wise decision," he said. "It's not ready to be everything you would want it to do."
One day, users said, Glass's performance will match its potential. Emergency responders could see real-time building layouts. Construction workers could read instructions without having to put down their tools. And a mother could teach her child to cook a family recipe from across the country.
Even today's Glass, Ackerson says, makes technology less intrusive by keeping his hands free and allowing him to see moments normally, not through the lens of a camera.

But for now, buyers should be prepared to spend a lot of money to help put a limited system through its paces.
And, of course, they should be prepared to deal with the social fallout that comes with it. Users should be prepared to be somewhat of a spectacle—and deal with a fair amount of derision. "There's a high probability of not getting laid if you're wearing it," Walsh said. "You're also buying into what is still now a social stigmatism."
Rubin "Hurricane" Carter never surrendered hope of regaining his freedom, not even after he was convicted of a triple murder, then convicted again and abandoned by many prominent supporters.
For 19 long years, the prizefighter was locked in a prison cell far away from the spotlight and the adulation of the boxing ring. But when he at last won his biggest fight — for exoneration — he betrayed little bitterness. Instead, Carter dedicated much of his remaining life to helping other prisoners and exposing other injustices.
The middleweight title contender, whose murder convictions became an international symbol of racial injustice and inspired a Bob Dylan song and a Hollywood film, died Sunday. He was 76.
The New Jersey native, who had suffered from prostate cancer, died in his sleep at his home in Toronto, John Artis, his former co-defendant and longtime friend and caregiver, told The Canadian Press.
Carter "didn't have any bitterness or anger — he kind of got above it all. That was his great strength," said Thom Kidrin, who became friends with Carter after visiting him several times in prison.
The boxer, a former petty criminal, became an undersized 160-pound contender and earned his nickname largely on his ferocity and punching power.
Although never a world champion, Carter went 27-12-1 with 19 knockouts, memorably stopping two-division champ Emile Griffith in the first round in 1963. He also fought for a middleweight title in 1964, losing a unanimous decision to Joey Giardello.
But his boxing career came to an abrupt end when he was imprisoned for three 1966 murders committed at a tavern in Paterson, N.J. He was convicted in 1967 and again in 1976 before being freed in 1985, when his convictions were thrown out after years of appeals. He then became a prominent public advocate for the wrongfully convicted from his new home in Canada.
His ordeal and its racial overtones were publicized in Dylan's 1975 song "Hurricane," several books and a 1999 film starring Denzel Washington, who received an Academy Award nomination for his portrayal.
In a statement issued Sunday, Washington praised Carter's "tireless fight to ensure justice for all."
Carter and Artis had been driving around Carter's hometown on the night that three white people were shot by two black men at the Lafayette Bar and Grill. They were convicted by an all-white jury largely on the testimony of two thieves who later recanted their stories.
Carter was granted a new trial and briefly freed in 1976, but he was sent back for nine more years after being convicted in a second trial.
"I wouldn't give up," Carter said in an interview in 2011 on PBS. "No matter that they sentenced me to three life terms in prison. I wouldn't give up. Just because a jury of 12 misinformed people ... found me guilty did not make me guilty. And because I was not guilty, I refused to act like a guilty person."
Dylan, a boxing aficionado, became aware of Carter's plight after reading the fighter's autobiography. He met Carter and co-wrote "Hurricane," which he performed on his Rolling Thunder Revue tour in 1975. The song concludes: "That's the story of the Hurricane/But it won't be over till they clear his name/And give him back the time he's done/Put him in a prison cell but one time he could-a been/The champion of the world."
Muhammad Ali and Coretta Scott King spoke out on Carter's behalf. Other celebrities also worked toward his release, joined by a network of friends and volunteers.
Carter eventually won his freedom from U.S. District Judge H. Lee Sarokin, who wrote that the boxer's prosecution had been "predicated upon an appeal to racism rather than reason, and concealment rather than disclosure."
Born on May 6, 1937, into a family of seven children, Carter struggled with a hereditary speech impediment and was sent to a juvenile reform center at 12 after an assault. He escaped and joined the Army in 1954 and learned to box while in West Germany.
After returning home, he committed a series of muggings and spent four years in various state prisons. Upon his release, he began his pro boxing career, winning 20 of his first 24 fights mostly by knockout.
At 5-foot-8, Carter was fairly short for a middleweight, but he was aggressive and threw waves of punches. His shaved head and menacing glower gave him an imposing ring presence but also contributed to a forbidding aura outside the ring. He was quoted as joking about killing police officers in a 1964 story in the Saturday Evening Post, which was later cited by Carter as a cause of his troubles with law enforcement.
Carter boxed regularly on television at Madison Square Garden and overseas in London, Paris and Johannesburg. Although his career appeared to be on a downswing before he was implicated in the murders, the 29-year-old fighter was hoping for a second middleweight title shot.
Carter defied his prison guards from the first day of his incarceration and spent time in solitary confinement because of it.
"When I walked into prison, I refused to wear their stripes," Carter said. "I refused to eat their food. I refused to work their jobs, and I would have refused to breathe the prison's air if I could have done so."
Carter eventually wrote and spoke eloquently about his plight, publishing his autobiography, "The Sixteenth Round," in 1974. Benefit concerts were held for his legal defense featuring Dylan, Joni Mitchell and Roberta Flack.
Although many of his celebrity friends abandoned the cause after his second conviction and an allegation of assault during his brief release, other advocates worked tirelessly on his behalf, culminating in Sarokin's ruling and two subsequent failed prosecutorial appeals to have the convictions reinstated. Each year on the anniversary Sarokin's decision, Carter called the judge to thank him.
After his release, Carter moved to Toronto, where he served as the executive director of the Association in Defence of the Wrongly Convicted from 1993 to 2005. He received two honorary doctorates for his work.
Canadian director Norman Jewison made Carter's story into a biographical film. Washington worked closely with Carter to capture the boxer's transformation and redemption.
"He's all love," Washington said while onstage with Carter at the 2000 ceremony where he won a Golden Globe. "He lost about 7,300 days of his life, and he's love."
The makers of "The Hurricane," however, were widely criticized for factual inaccuracies and glossing over other parts of Carter's story, including his criminal past and a reputation for a violent temper. Giardello sued the film's producers for its depiction of a racist fix in his victory over Carter, who had long acknowledged that Giardello deserved the win.
Kidrin spoke with Carter on Wednesday.
"He said, 'You know, look, death's coming. I'm ready for it. But it's really going to have to take me because I'm positive to the end.'"
___
AP Sports Writer Rick Freeman and AP Drama Writer Mark Kennedy contributed to this report in New York.

      India tops global remittances  

                 list; received $70 bn in 2013

 :                              WORLD BANK 

 APRIL 11 :- HAVING received $70 billion in 2013, India has topped the list of countries receiving remittance from overseas workers, the World Bank said on Friday.
the World Bank's latest issue of the Migration and Development Brief, said international migrants from developing countries are expected to send $436 billion in remittances to their home countries this year (2014)
   In 2014, remittance flows to developing countries will see an increase of  7.8 per cent over the 2013 volume of  $104 billion ,rising to $516 billion in 2016. Global remittances, including those to high-income countries, are estimated at $581 billion this year, from $542 billion in 2013, rising to $681 billion in 2016.
"Remittances have become a major component of the balance of payments of nations. India lead the chart of remittance flows, receiving $70 billion last year (2013), followed by China with $60 billion and Philippines with $25 billions ," said Kaushik Basu, senior vise president and chief economist of World Bank.

India had received $69 billion in remittance in 2012.
  Basu said there was no doubt that these flows act as an antidote to poverty and promote prosperity.


KAUSHIK BASU,World Bank Chief Economist
"Remittances have become a major component of the balance of payments of nations. India lead the chart of remittance flows, receiving $70 billion last year (2013), followed by China with $60 billion and Philippines with $25 billions ," 
            -KAUSHIK BASU

INSPIRATIONAL...... 20 YEARS AFTER             GENOCIDE, VICTIM, ATTACKER NOW FRIENDS...

RWANDA :today, the country marks the 20th anniversary of the start of its bloody genocide in which over 1 million were killed.....

 nyamata, april 11 :He lost her baby daughter and her right hand to a manic killing spree. He  wielded the machete that took both.
Yet today ,despite coming from opposite sides of an unspeakable shared post, Alice Mukarurinda and Emmanuel Ndayisaba are friends. she is the treasurer and he the vice president of a group that build simple brick houses for genocide survivors.
Their story of ethenic violence, extreme guilt and , to some degree, reconciliation is the story of Rwanda today, 20 years after its hutu majority killed more than 1 million tutsis and moderate hutus.
"Whenever i i look at my arm I remember what happened ,"said Alice . As she speaks, Emmanuel - the man who killed her baby - sits close enough that his left hand and her right hand stumps sometimes touch.
On Monday april 6, Rwanda marks the 20th anniversary of the beginning of 100 days of bloody mayhem.
For Alice, a Tutsi,the genocide began in 1992. hutu community leaders began importing machetes. houses were burned, cars taken, on April 6, 1994, when a plane carrying Rwanda's president was shot down, Hutus started killing Tutsis  who ran for their lives and flooded Alice's village.
Three days later, local Hutu leaders took Emmanuel ,then 23, to a Tutsi home and ordered him to use a machete. Emmanuel had never killed before. But inside his house he murdered 14 people.
During one killing spree, Alice, who was in hiding, was found by Hutus including Emmanuel. he rained down machete blows on Alice's right arm, severing it just above the wrist. He sliced her face. She was bloodied, scarred, and missing a hand...
After the genocide, Emmanuel gnawed by guilt, began asking family members of his victim for forgiveness. He joined a group of genocide killers and survivors.
it was there he saw Alice. At first he avoided her. Eventually he kneeled before her and asked forgiveness. After two weeks of thought and discussions, she said yes.
  "We had attended workshops and training and our heart kind of free, and i found it easy to forgive." she says."the bible says you should forgive any you will also be forgiven"

"I've been asking myself why i acted like a fool, listening to such words, that this person is bad and that person is bad," Emmanuel says . 
"the same people that encouraged the genocide are the ones saying there was no genocide."  
WASHINGTON : Scientists have developed a computer algorithm that predicts whether a photo will go viral on FaceBook by watching how fast it is shared. Stanford researchers said the clue to predicting witch of the many millions of photos on facebook will go viral lie in 'cascades', a term used to describe photos or videos being shared multiple times.
                                                                                 
-PTI

2 ballistic missile destroyers to be deployed to counter N korea threat

{associated press, tokyo, april 6.} US DEFENCE secretary Chuck Hagel delivered a two-pronged warning to Asia Pacific nations  Sunday, announcing that the US will send two additional ballistic missile destroyers to japan to counter the North Korean threat, and saying China must better respect its neighbours.
IN usually forceful remarks about China, Hagel drew a direct link between Russia's takeover of Ukraine's Crimea region and the ongoing territorial disputes between China, Japan and others over remotes islands in the east China sea.
Hagel, who will travel to China later this week, called the Asian nations a "great power",and added,"with this power comes new and wider responsibilities as to how you use that power ,how you employ that military power."
He said he will talk to the Chinese about having respect for their neighbours, and said, "coercion, intimidation is a very deadly thing that lead only to conflict. All nations, all people deserve respect no matter how large or how small."



"I WILL BE TALKING WITH THE CHINESE ABOUT RESPECT FOR THEIR NEIGHBOURS. COERCION, INTIMIDATION IS A VERY DEADLY THING THAT LEADS ONLY TO CONFLICT. ALL NATIONS, ALL PEOPLE DESERVE RESPECT NO MATTER HOW LARGE OR HOW SMALL
 -Chuck Hagel,US Defence Secretary
YES, you may not believe but it is very easy to hack your personal data.

                                Did you said how?

your data & personal password can be easily hacked by cheap keyloggers.




I will soon tell you that what is a key logger and how it can harm your computer. be updated..... 

...DOWNLOAD LATEST IDM WITH CRACK...

DOWNLOAD IDM 6.19 MEDIAFIRE LINK GIVEN BELOW 

                                     

                       click here to download....

Next PostNewer Posts Previous PostOlder Posts Home